The Las Vegas Review Journal has an excellent editorial on 'Stand Your Ground' laws.  They explain a couple of cases showing why these laws are necessary and also take a shot at the enemies of the human right to self-defense who are waging a war against our natural rights.

In another editorial in the New York Times, the author laments, "Once a Progressive State, Minnesota Is Now a Fief of the N.R.A."  I look forward to the day the enemies of freedom eulogize similarly about New Jersey.  The author most definitely is not a libertarian:

Sometimes I think the N.R.A. isn’t really about guns at all. It’s about making certain that the public — our political and civil society, in other words — has no ability to limit the rights of an individual. That is really what the logic of the “concealed carry” and “shall require” and “shoot first” laws says.

 She left out the Second Amendment.  It implies that too.  Hold on while I cry her a river that she no longer has the ability to limit the rights of an individual.  Just one more anti-gunner proving the old adage, "gun control is about control not guns."