|
For most Americans,
guns are not a political issue. People buy and own guns to protect
their families, not to commit crimes. The truth is that even millions
of Americans who support and vote for gun control own guns themselves,
because deep down they share the basic human need to feel secure
in their homes.
The gun control
movement has lost momentum in recent years. The Democratic Party
has been conspicuously silent on the issue in recent elections because
they know it's a political loser. In the midst of declining public
support for new gun laws, more and more states have adopted concealed-carry
programs. The September 11th terrorist attacks and last year's hurricanes
only made matters worse for gun control proponents, as millions
of Americans were starkly reminded that we cannot rely on government
to protect us from criminals. Gun sales have gone up.
Most supporters
of gun rights take no pleasure in this fact, nor do they trumpet
it as a political victory over gun control forces. The time has
come to stop politicizing gun ownership, and start promoting responsible
use of firearms to make America a safer place. Guns are here to
stay; the question is whether only criminals will have them.
The media has
not been honest in reporting about guns, especially when it comes
to statistics about law-abiding individuals who use firearms to
prevent or deter crimes. Many of the "assault rifles"
vilified by the press are in fact sporting rifles that are no longer
available to hunters and outdoorsmen. Of course true military-style
fully automatic rifles remain widely available to criminals on the
black market.
The gun control
debate generally ignores the historical and philosophical underpinnings
of the Second amendment. The Second amendment is not about hunting
deer or keeping a pistol in your nightstand. It is not about protecting
oneself against common criminals. It is about preventing tyranny.
The Founders knew that unarmed citizens would never be able to overthrow
a tyrannical government as they did. They envisioned government
as a servant, not a master, of the American people. The muskets
they used against the British Army were the assault rifles of that
time. It is practical, rather than alarmist, to understand that
unarmed citizens cannot be secure in their freedoms.
It's convenient
for gun banners to dismiss this argument by saying, "That could
never happen here, this is America." But history shows that
only vigilant people can keep government under control. By banning
certain weapons today, we may plant the seeds for tyranny to flourish
decades from now.
Tortured interpretations
of the Second amendment cannot change the fact that both the letter
of the amendment itself and the legislative history conclusively
show that the Founders intended ordinary citizens to be armed. The
notion that the Second amendment confers rights only upon organized
state-run militias is preposterous; the amendment is meaningless
unless it protects the gun rights of individuals.
Gun
control may have faded as a political issue, but the mentality that
Washington knows best – and that certain constitutional rights are
anachronisms – is alive and well. Look for gun control advocates
to bide their time and look for new ways to resurrect the issue
in 2008 and beyond.
LewRockwell.com
|